From the Bay Citizen:

Regulators have refused to issue permits necessary for the [America’s Cup] to move forward until organizers can prove the event won’t significantly spread invasive seaweed through San Francisco Bay.

Concerns over exotic seaweed, including Undaria pinnatifida, a fast-growing Asian species that reaches 10 feet and poses dangers to native kelp species, prompted the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board on Friday to reject a 107-page permit application filed late last month by the Port of San Francisco.

But before anybody panics:

If it appears that it will be impossible to prevent the spread of the seaweed, [Watershed Division Chief Shin-Roei Lee] wrote, then the Port and America’s Cup Event Authority will need to propose compensation, such as providing funds to an invasive species eradication program.

Invasive Seaweed Fears Stall America’s Cup []
The 34th America’s Cup Environmental Impact Report (And Issues) [SocketSite]

Recent Articles

Comments from “Plugged-In” Readers

  1. Posted by sf

    San Francisco- where fun comes to DIE

  2. Posted by tipster

    If Larry the Billionaire wants to play in the bay he has to pay.

  3. Posted by lol

    Well, I don’t like over-regulation but I think it’s a valid concern. Sometimes habitat destruction can be pinpointed to a very specific occurrence like with the Taxifolia disaster in the Mediterranean:
    Now they’re stuck with the mess. I have seen it. It’s not pretty.

  4. Posted by [anon.ed]

    What’s the difference between these catamarans and the tankers and huge freighters from all over the world? These are huge boats that already come and go from the Bay daily, spewing bilge?

  5. Posted by sf

    The difference is that the tankers spill millions of gallons of crude oil into the Bay.

  6. Posted by [anon.ed]

    Yes, but in terms of non-native flora and fauna hitching a ride?

  7. Posted by Delancey

    The invasive species problem is real. Tankers and freighters are monitored, and don’t wander all over the bay.
    BTW, the america’s cup seems to be down to just 5 challengers, of whom only two (new zealand and artemis) are expected to last long enough to actually build an AC72 boat.

  8. Posted by joh

    What’s the difference between these catamarans and the tankers and huge freighters from all over the world?
    Sadly, invasive species threats (and other environmental threats) are downgraded for trade and commerce.

  9. Posted by [anon.ed]

    Delancy and joh are pretty much polar opposites. I think it stands to reason joh has it more right. Not sure of course, but whether or not something wanders around the bay would pale in comparison to something jettisoning exponentially more bilge.

  10. Posted by EBGuy

    From KALW via a Nov. 2010 SFGate blog: But something is making people in the shipping industry very nervous. It’s the new ballast water discharge standard in California; a standard that’s one thousand times stricter than the international one. It took effect this year for smaller vessels, but it will affect any vessel discharging in California starting in 2012.
    That said, I just read the Bay Citizen article. The fear is about spreading the invasive seaweed [which] has taken root beneath some piers in San Francisco and could spread on the hulls of spectator boats as they enter and move around the bay.

  11. Posted by Stucco-sux

    What about all the huge tankers that sail into the bay every day from all over the world? Does anyone really think those thousands of hulls a year are as clean as a millionaire’s competitive sailing vessel? Good lord things have gotten way out of hand.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *