July 13, 2007

A "Completely Unique Creative Remodel" On Jackson Street

3042 Jackson Street #4

It’s being billed as a “[c]ompletely unique creative remodel…resulting in a modern floor plan that's open, flexible, yet warm & inviting.” And while we’re definitely conceding the first part, and honestly admire the vision, the kitchen leaves us scratching (and perhaps sympathetically rubbing) our heads.

∙ Listing: 3042 Jackson Street #4 (2/2) - $1,595,000 [MLS]

First Published: July 13, 2007 3:30 AM

Comments from "Plugged In" Readers

it's very pretty, although claustrophobic for me.

But midgets need lodging too!

I can't imagine spending so much on a place where you can't even stand up in 60% of the flat.

Posted by: ex SF-er at July 13, 2007 5:16 AM

How does one calculate the actual square footage of this unit, if there are areas of floor space that you could not stand up in? Do you only count the floor surface, or the areas where an adult could stand without hitting their head? Nice design job btw.

Posted by: Morgan at July 13, 2007 7:08 AM

It's nice to see that the set designer from _Being_John_Malkovich_ is finding work.

Seriously, though, in the early 80's, a very good friend of mine lived in a 70's version of this apartment, and it was pretty pleasant. That apartment had killer views facing east and a nice deck facing west. I think he paid $250/mo for it. That was before rent control applied to 2-3 unit buildings.

Posted by: Former Lurker at July 13, 2007 8:01 AM

$1.6 mil to live in an attic? i've seen it all.

Posted by: bilbo baggins at July 13, 2007 9:02 AM

Bonk! That was my head hitting the ceiling while trying to chop veggies in the completely unworkable, carved out kitchen.

Posted by: artdoggie at July 13, 2007 9:21 AM

LOL @ the comments here. What a joke! Read the disclosures; this whole thing might be unwarranted!

Someone has guts to put that kind of effort into that renovation and ask $1.6M for that!

Posted by: eddy at July 13, 2007 9:47 AM

Those are some KILLER chairs. (seriously)

I was so busy looking out for decapitation risks that I missed those two chairs on my first sweep of the place.

Very cool. I'm sure they're like $59,855, but I'm hoping to pick up some knockoffs in Chinatown for $32.50

Posted by: ex SF-er at July 13, 2007 10:19 AM

Feng Shui experts would say those ceilings are a major no no.

Posted by: anon at July 13, 2007 10:39 AM

Feng shui? That is soooooo 2005. 2007 is the year of the low ceiling :)

Posted by: Brutus at July 13, 2007 10:52 AM

But seriously folks... Suppose you had an attic space.. Do you think this is an ok look for, say, a media room or something.. Not for an entire apt, obviously!!

Posted by: Sleepiguy at July 13, 2007 11:46 AM

Every year, someone tries to sell a property which is simply outlandish. For me, last year that place was a shack on Chattanooga St in my neighbourhood that was basically a pre-earthquake *box* which sold for close to a million. Check out this site :
http://www.save39chattanooga.org/
This one absolutely takes the cake this year. Ludicrous !

[Editor's Note: Ah yes, 39 Chattanooga and its sale.]

Posted by: Englishman in SF at July 13, 2007 12:02 PM

Morgan - while 7-foot ceiling heights are the minimum for legal space in typical right angle walls, for buildings with sloped walls, the cutoff is 5-foot ceiling heights. All the space with more than 5-foot ceiling heights is included in the building area whereas everything lower than 5-feet is excluded.

Posted by: Miles at July 13, 2007 1:10 PM

Sleepiguy - Yes! Great look/use of space for a media room and/or a master suite. I even think it works as an individual unit but I'd be hard pressed to pay for a lot of "open" space that looks great but I can't actually use.

Posted by: Michael at July 13, 2007 2:27 PM

I actually like this unit. At least it is interesting and a great location. I lived in an attic unit like this in college, and it really was not so bad, and I liked hearing the rain on the roof. Everybody does not want to live in a glass box in Soma by the way. The price is another matter however.

Posted by: anon2 at July 13, 2007 5:57 PM

I had to laugh when they used "penthouse" for an "attic", but it sounds like a "deal" since the taxes and HOA will be under $2K a month ($1,995), and a 6.5% 90% loan will be just over $9K ($9,073)...

Posted by: Pac Heights Renter at July 16, 2007 7:08 AM

Miles is correct, except that any space with less than a 5'-0" ceiling height is suppose to be INACCESSIBLE - read: this entire space MUST be unwarranted, because if it was permitted and inspected, they would have had to drop 5' walls around the perimeter. The building code also states that OVER 50% of the space must have higher than 7'-0" ceilings to even be used as a habitable space (can't tell if that complies from the photos).

I'd say "caveat emptor," but people on here have called me un-capitalistic for criticizing people's unethical ways of becoming America's Next Top Millionaire! $1.6 - wow

Posted by: rg at July 16, 2007 9:32 AM

I love the stools by the kitchen giving the impression that there is a breakfast bar there or something; when there is a 1" ledge leading to the kitchen sink.

Did anyone actually go see this place on OH?

Posted by: eddy at July 16, 2007 10:56 AM

I went to see the place, felt very claustrophobic and I am only 5'1''. Imagine how someone 6' would feel.

Posted by: m at July 16, 2007 4:45 PM

You'd have to be stooped/[Removed by Editor (but nice play on words)] to pay that price.

Posted by: Jlasf at July 17, 2007 2:41 AM

This place is no longer on the market. Does anyone know if it sold and, if so, does anyone know the price? Or was it taken off the market?

[Editor's Note: It's in contract (and we'll let you know when it sells).]

Posted by: Jeff at September 13, 2007 12:20 AM

It has sold (I own it). Thanks for your very negative posts, though. I'm 6-2 and don't have to stoop at all, nor do I feel "claustrophobic" in my new home. Then again, I'm fairly biased. Further, if you think it's overpriced, then you clearly don't understand Pacific Heights. You pay a premium in areas like this for two reasons: 1. Hey, it's Pac Heights; and 2. There is really no downside risk for property value. My wife and I couldn't be happier.

Posted by: Tracy at October 3, 2007 5:13 PM

Post a comment


(required - will be published)


(required - will not be published, sold, or shared)


(optional - your "Posted by" name will link to this URL)

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


Continue Perusing SocketSite:

« As Promised: From Coming Soon To On The Market (4128 24th Street) | HOME | Millennium Tower Trivia (And One Bedroom Resale) »