651%20Dolores.jpg
A plan to raze the Second Church of Christ Scientist church on the southeast corner of Dolores and Cumberland and build a smaller church and eight dwelling units on the site was drafted back in 2006 but ran into a wall of neighborhood opposition and was never approved.
Having since been yellow-tagged by the City as an unreinforced masonry building which doesn’t meet current seismic standards, plans to reinforce the building and convert the vacant 22,000 square foot church into four residential units are moving forward with the Planning Department’s recommendation that the proposed conversion be approved this week.
As we first reported about the proposed “Light House” project in September, new partition walls within the existing auditorium and mezzanine would divide the space for three of the new dwelling units while an all new penthouse level would be created by raising the suspended ceiling seven feet and adding a new 3,020 square foot floor beneath the dome:



As proposed, the existing surface parking lot behind the church would be converted into a landscaped garden and a four car garage would be constructed in the basement (click to enlarge).

The estimated construction cost for the conversion is “between $1,165,000 and $2,200,000″ and will take nine months with projected occupancy in the spring of 2015 if approved.

Recent Articles

Comments from “Plugged-In” Readers

  1. Posted by mdg

    Dear Lord –
    I pray to thee –
    Please shine a light on this project and the [people] at the planning commission – and help them to see the light
    About what a stupid idea this is – and what a waste of effort and space –
    this should be torn down – for all sorts of reasons – like – IT’S FUGLY – IT’s unsafe, and a crappy use of space…..

  2. Posted by gribble

    I think it is a great re-use of the bldg. I’ve always thought it was a rather handsome building overlooking Dolores Park.
    This will be the second large church repurposed across the street from the park.
    Which is great – we need about five fewer churches clogging the streets with their illegal parking on the weekends.

  3. Posted by James

    This church doesn’t generate any parking: it has been closed for years. And thankfully, “fugly” is not a credible critique of architecture or land use. Sure, crisp edges and stacked boxes are the style of the current day, but a dome here and there on an older building is a nice variant in the neighborhood’s roofline, indicating the former use of the building.

  4. FWIW, the sister building to this is down in San Jose: http://www.sanjose.com/underbelly/unbelly/Sanjose/james/james25.html.
    It is also a vacant domed URM building overlooking a park. It has been vacant for decades. The difference though is that the Dolores Park, SF location is a lot more appealing compared to the St. James Park, SJ location.

  5. Posted by Sierrajeff

    I think it’s a great building, and great that it’ll be preserved. I think that getting only 4 units out of it is sacreligious, though – seems like the space could be divided up much better than it is.

  6. Posted by gribble

    @James: I know it has been closed for years. If they had re-built as a smaller church and apartments it would have created more illegal church parking on Sundays than we currently suffer each week.

  7. Posted by 7 by 7

    Only 4 units out of this thing means the units are going for at least $2 million each, probably $3.5 million for the uber-luxurious one under the dome.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *