December 2, 2013

Zoned For 400 Feet In Height, 200 Feet Proposed For 300 California

300%20California.jpg

The eight-story building at 300 California Street was constructed in 1946, rising 112 feet in height with 77 parking spaces for autos in an underground garage below. A plan to raze the building and build 20 stories on the site was proposed back in 1996 but abandoned.

On the boards since 2007, a plan to simply add four stories atop the existing building at the corner of California and Battery has been dusted-off, a plan which will bring the downtown building's height to 192 feet in an area zoned for the development up to 400.

300%20California%20Addition.gif

A 1,200 square foot publicly-accessible rooftop garden would be built as part of the project.

300%20California%20Rooftop.gif

As the expanded 300 California Street building and corner would look fully rendered:

300%20California%20Rendered.jpg

San Francisco's Planning Department is recommending that the City's Planning Commission approve the four story addition as proposed this week.

300%20California%20Rendered%20Street.jpg

First Published: December 2, 2013 8:45 AM

Comments from "Plugged In" Readers

You can't hear them, but the dogs are howling :p

Posted by: Sharperblue at December 2, 2013 9:28 AM

A building that could really use a vertical extension is One Market

Posted by: guest at December 2, 2013 9:39 AM

Good - Putting the rooftop mechanical EQ in a penthouse enclosure per the rendering will improve the sightlines for many people in the surrounding taller buildings.

That assumes that the green in the rendering is a green roof and not a color code for "put ugly stuff here".

Posted by: redseca2 at December 2, 2013 9:49 AM

They've extended several buildings in this fashion in the Texas Medical Center, where I used to work. In those cases, the buildings were originally engineered with future vertical expansion in mind... I wonder if this building was similarly designed.

Posted by: outtahere at December 2, 2013 10:25 AM

Sad waste of potential, and sadly fugly design.

Posted by: Sierrajeff at December 2, 2013 10:35 AM

Those "publicly accessible" rooftop gardens are BS these days. Post 9/11, it's really difficult to get through building security to enjoy the views unless you actually work in that building (hi there, One Market Plaza).

Posted by: JR at December 2, 2013 10:38 AM

It should be 200ft, great spot for a new skyscraper!

Posted by: Alex at December 2, 2013 10:58 AM

There was a similar proposal for 100 California a few years ago. (The building was supposedly designed to accommodate several extra levels). Anyone know the status of that?

Posted by: steve at December 2, 2013 11:13 AM

Help, I'm melting....

Posted by: BobN at December 2, 2013 3:22 PM

My father works in one of 400 California's corner offices, which face that building. I didn't realize it, but the other day I sat in his office and didn't even notice it. Adding four stories should at least add some more space in a city that needs it.

Posted by: DimSumNoodles at December 2, 2013 4:44 PM

400 feet sounds better.

600 even betterer.

Posted by: mdg at December 3, 2013 9:26 AM

Perhaps someone who owns the high rise immediately to the north has the juice with the City to protect the majority of the windows in that property from being blocked by a taller building...Or maybe they are just owned by the same person and they are balancing out their investments...

Posted by: noe mom at December 3, 2013 12:28 PM

Post a comment


(required - will be published)


(required - will not be published, sold, or shared)


(optional - your "Posted by" name will link to this URL)

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


Continue Perusing SocketSite:

« Dorms For Developers In San Francisco? | HOME | With Easter Egg Hunts And Putt-ering In Mind: A Woodside Estate »