November 15, 2013

Designs For Developing Half A City Block Along Hayes

150%20Van%20Ness.gif

As we first reported last week, the Emerald Fund is quietly working on plans to raze the 108-foot building at 150 Van Ness Avenue and build a half-block building rising 12 stories on the site, and we now have the renderings for the development that's being proposed.

150%20Van%20Ness%20Rendering.jpg

Once again, the building would rise up to 120 feet high and house 429 apartments averaging 734 square feet apiece, running the length of Hayes Street from Van Ness to Polk Street:

150%20Van%20Ness%20Rendering%20Polk.jpg

And as proposed, 9,000 square feet of retail would be constructed on the ground floor of the building with parking for 215 cars and 207 bikes in a level below.

150%20Van%20Ness%20Rendering%20Detail.jpg

First Published: November 15, 2013 2:00 PM

Comments from "Plugged In" Readers

Pleasantly forgettable.

Like an Embassy Suites Hotel on a side street in DC or Frankfurt.

A reminder that not everything has to call attention to itself.

Posted by: Invented at November 15, 2013 2:18 PM

Hm, I quite like it.

Now if only we could get the Fox Plaza eyesore rebuilt...

Posted by: anon at November 15, 2013 2:21 PM

I like it; certainly a lot better than what's there now, and it will provide a nice link between the glass of the retrofitted tower next door (and other new glass towers on Market) and the stone of the Civic Center complex.

Posted by: Sierrajeff at November 15, 2013 2:35 PM

Forgettable is right. Reminds me of something on K or Eye Streets in DC.

However, as stated, not all buildings have to be memorable. Just look at the swath of homes comprising the Sunset, or even rows of Edwardians. Regardless of its lasting visual impression the building is far better than the planned boredom proposed for Fell/Oak in HV.

Posted by: Mark at November 15, 2013 3:45 PM

I think it would be reasonable to have a bolder look than that, given the location. As for the old building, I'm not too broken up about it going away, I just wish I could get a look at the lobby before it does.

Posted by: Adam at November 15, 2013 4:22 PM

You'd think if they were going to the effort they would add a few more stories to the building.

Posted by: Me at November 15, 2013 11:42 PM

Why not just restore and adaptive-reuse the current building? While it breaks down the massing on Van Ness a bit, aesthetically it's worse!

Posted by: Henry at November 15, 2013 11:47 PM

Only 9000 sq ft of commercial in a block-long building?

Posted by: BobN at November 16, 2013 5:39 AM


EH - Whatever - It's OK

Anyway to save that gorgeous lobby....?

WHat a waste if it's not ......

Hey Board - save the lobby and approve the uninspiring building - at least people will go and look at the lobby - I can see a cafe in there serving before symphony and other events - Lovely

Posted by: mdg at November 16, 2013 8:34 AM

If only it were going to be 5 times taller...

Posted by: lyqwyd at November 16, 2013 8:38 AM

MDG

Love idea of an indoor private/public space.

Allow developer to increase height along Polk in exchange for preserving the lobby. (and building?)

Could One Sansome be a model?
http://www.artandarchitecture-sf.com/tag/citigroup

Also, a taller building along Polk will give units great views of the Civic Center buildings -a good thing all around.

Posted by: Invented at November 16, 2013 9:37 AM

Not the most amazing design, but it fits the context and activates an otherwise dead block without overwhelming it.

Credit to Emerald Fund for adding over 800 units to a woefully underutilized block.

Posted by: JL at November 16, 2013 10:33 AM

The building that sits there now looks like it had an outer-skin put on in probably the 60's? Underneath i bet it is amazing, and could be unskinned and restored, and serve as the anchor of the development added (possibly up and or) behind it.

Posted by: brianSF at November 16, 2013 6:49 PM


Hey Invented

great template

Agreed

Cheers!

Posted by: mdg at November 17, 2013 7:17 AM

Nice to see some new development in that spot. Could be a little taller.

Posted by: Joel V at November 18, 2013 11:12 AM

Me likey.

Posted by: Kathleen at November 19, 2013 5:11 PM

Here's what 150 Van Ness was like prior to its mid-century remodel. I believe much of the interior architectural elements are still intact.

http://webbie1.sfpl.org/multimedia/sfphotos/AAC-6560.jpg

Posted by: Matt of Uptown at November 20, 2013 9:23 AM

I find it odd for the Civic Center, which has some very beautiful Beaux Art buildings in grey stone. I would not have any comment if it were build elsewhere.

As to height keep in mind that there are restrictions around the Civic Center to keep shadows out of the park.

Posted by: Cody at November 20, 2013 12:23 PM

I know we do not need landmark buildings on every site, but isn't this important enough to get a little better architecture than the (I love it) "Embassy Suites on K Street". I mean, this is so utterly banal.

But yes...well needed and well located.

Posted by: Brian M at December 3, 2013 3:54 PM

Post a comment


(required - will be published)


(required - will not be published, sold, or shared)


(optional - your "Posted by" name will link to this URL)

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


Continue Perusing SocketSite:

« San Francisco's Certified 2013 Election Results | HOME | New Designs For Dwellings (And Retail) At Market And Sanchez »