July 30, 2012
The State Of San Francisco's Downtown: Property, People And Parking

A few highlights from the Planning Department's latest Monitoring Report for San Francisco's Downtown which will be presented to the Planning Commission this week:
Downtown vacancy rates in San Francisco declined in 2011 and are now at 11% for office and 6.7% for retail as average downtown office rents have increased 16% to $39.25 per square foot. Roughly 13% (1.8 million square feet) of proposed commercial space in San Francisco's entitlement pipeline is located Downtown.
Downtown San Francisco had a net loss of 31 residential units from demolition in 2011 versus a net gain of 269 units citywide. However, 9% of the proposed residential projects in the entitlement pipeline, or roughly 3,900 units, are located Downtown.
While overall employment in San Francisco increased 1% citywide in 2011, it increased 14% to 233,500 jobs Downtown. And the method by which employed residents in the northeast quadrant of San Francisco commute to work has changed relatively little from 2000 to 2010 with the 2010 split being 32% transit, 31% walk, 24% car, 2% bike, 8% work at home, and 2% other.
In terms of parking, there are roughly 33,400 off-street parking spaces Downtown (about 20% of the 166,520 spaces citywide) and the City's plan to limit the number of long-term parking spaces to the number that existed in 1984 has generally been achieved by restricting the supply of off-street parking spaces in new developments.
∙ San Francisco Downtown Plan Annual Monitoring Report 2011 [sf-planning.org]
∙ San Francisco Employment And Unemployment Both Tick Up In June [SocketSite]
∙ San Francisco’s Total Housing Inventory And Pipeline Report [SocketSite]
First Published: July 30, 2012 9:45 AM
Comments from "Plugged In" Readers
surprising to see the use of bikes hasn't increase in the past 10 yrs. The only impact on cars has been the new option of working from home.
Posted by: spencer at July 30, 2012 10:50 AM
@ spencer...right about the flat growth of bikes. Based on what the SF Bike Coalition has been putting out I was thinking that 8% of people rode their bikes to work!
Posted by: Surprised at July 30, 2012 11:23 AM
re: bicycle commuting. For a minority report, from Saturday's City Exposed blog at The Chron, Bike commute more than just a ride to work, relevant 'graph:
In recent years, the city has encouraged riding by leaving welcome mats in the form of bike lanes, including on part of Market Street. Longtime riders like Cullen have plenty of new company – recent surveys by the Municipal Transportation Authority show a 71 percent ridership increase in the past five years.
In theory, these two numbers aren't necessarily in conflict…but it'll be interesting to see if the Planning Department's Monitoring Report agrees with the increase reported by the MTA when it's next released.
Posted by: Brahma (incensed renter) at July 30, 2012 11:24 AM
I am also pretty surprised with the low numbers of bikes. Bikes in my office building are taking over room after room in the garage.
I often get behind 15 slow kids at 8:50AM on Market (time I now avoid if possible for cycling). Then on the way back up, the turn to the Wiggle around Safeway's feels like a freeway on-ramp.
Posted by: lol at July 30, 2012 11:36 AM
I would like to see these stats for the whole city, not just downtown. I would guess that bike ridership to work is way up in the Mission, Western Addition, Inner Sunset, etc. This is where more young people live. They bike and can't afford to live downtown.
Posted by: biker at July 30, 2012 11:44 AM
My husband and I live downtown and we walk to our offices downtown. Biking to work is not appealing right now considering all the cars and buses. I wonder where the people work who are driving to work - maybe the East Bay or Pennisula. I can't image anyone driving to work that lives downtown.
Posted by: sashi at July 30, 2012 12:08 PM
I live near Folsom & 7th and bike to 18th & Florida. Perfect route for biking. I can't believe any stats that say that biking is flat. It's getting crowded out there!
Posted by: GaryFolsoma at July 30, 2012 1:27 PM
"I can't image anyone driving to work that lives downtown."
I do, many days a week, and it is awesome if you need to save time. I can get garage to garage (1.5 miles) in 5 minutes flat....and easily pick up/drop off my wife at caltrain on the way if need be. Biking such a short distance is a hassle (no secure bike parking and I need to dress "professionally"). I prefer to walk when I'm not doing the caltrain limo duty.
Posted by: anon at July 30, 2012 1:51 PM
I believe the 2% is of the total number of people who commute downtown, a lot of whom come from other cities.
The percentage of SF residents who commute by bike would of course be higher.
The ridership is up 7% over the last two years. There was a 30% increase in the counts, but they attributed most of it as a result of the fact that they shifted counting from summer to the school year.
Details here:
http://www.sfmta.com/cms/rbikes/documents/2011BicycleCountReportsml.pdf
http://www.sfmta.com/cms/rbikes/documents/2011BicycleCountReportsml.pdf
Posted by: tipster at July 30, 2012 1:52 PM
Indeed,
This MTA study shows overall ridership has more than doubled (109%) from 2006 to 2011.
75K cyclists each and every day.
Posted by: lol at July 30, 2012 2:24 PM
31% walk to work. This is exactly why we need to build much, much more residential apartments/condos downtown, which are market-rate. Since the Bay Area is not building more BART or CalTrain lines, which are all stuffed with people similarly to the MUNI, the best way to deal with the increase in jobs is to build more housing near workplaces, so people can walk to work. I really wish SF would up-zone and add density anywhere within 10 blocks of BART and CalTrain stops. People can walk to work or walk to public transportation. I would gladly live downtown, if there was an affordable option. Right now, I either have to be practically a millionaire or a drug addict to get a place downtown. This could change if we greatly added units north and south of market st. Wish we would.
Posted by: MarinaRenter at July 30, 2012 6:01 PM
So is anyone going to point out that the numbers from 2000 equal 101% and the 2010 numbers equal 99% ?
Posted by: Peter at July 30, 2012 6:16 PM
Peter, the numbers not "adding" is due to rounding in each of the individual parts.
Posted by: Lance at July 30, 2012 6:56 PM
The SFMTA and SF Planning department. Together at last... cooking up vanity data and throwing around catch phrases like Tom Cruise at a Scientology convention.
Spare me your unquestioning, uncritical republishing of tripe.
Posted by: Stucco_Sux at July 30, 2012 10:53 PM
biking TO work can be problemmatic: kid drop-off, the need to look professional, getting groceries, etc
But keeping a bike AT work is very useful:
dashing to meetings, quick errands, and expanded lunch options, all door-to-door with no parking hastles.
Bike infrastructure serves all of this but the numbers only focus on commutes. Silly bureaucrats
Posted by: rubber_chicken at July 31, 2012 10:08 AM
Here's a bike commute tip for those who have to wear suits in the office: Lay out a long dry cleaning bag and carefully lay out and smooth your suit pants, layer another dry cleaner bag and lay out your suit jacket. Layer a third bag and carefully lay out your shirt/blouse. Roll it up lightly from the bottom, smoothing any wrinkles as you go, and pack it in your panniers or backpack. Voila! Works like a charm every time.
Posted by: Sunnyside to FiDi at July 31, 2012 11:47 AM
Post a comment
Continue Perusing SocketSite:
« Raising The Threshold For Requiring Below Market Rate (BMR) Units | HOME | Cottage Charm In The City Listed For Under Four Hundred Grand »