141 Hampshire
As a plugged-in reader notes, the condo Tim Lincecum rented in 2010, and from which he was accused of stealing and destroying $200,000 worth of household items in 2011, has returned to the market listed for $1,795,000.
Having been listed for as much as $3,500,000 in 2008 but withdrawn from the market in 2010 last asking $1,700,000 prior to Lincecum’s leasing, the current listing for the 2,790 square foot 141 Hampshire Street Unit B sports photos from its pre-Lincecum days.
141 Hampshire Unit B
Bonus points for identifying $200,000 worth of “bedding, doors, carpet, pillows, kitchenware, linens, furniture, household appliances, art work, decorations, patio furniture, lights, lamps, and mirrors” which could have been stolen or destroyed.
∙ Listing: 141 Hampshire Street Unit #B (3/3) 2,790 sqft – $1,795,000 [redfin.com]
Inside Tim Lincecum’s Old Party Pad (Pre-Alleged Trashing) [SocketSite]
There Might Have Been Smoke, But No Report Of A Fire… [SocketSite]

Recent Articles

Comments from “Plugged-In” Readers

  1. Posted by EH

    Or, more to the point, identifying “$200,000 of new stuff in the house.” I certainly haven’t heard of silverware or pillows coming with a house purchase as anything but an aberration (outside of ‘fully furnished’).

  2. Posted by NoeValleyJim

    I don’t see how this place could have ever listed for $3.5M. Was that for the whole building maybe? This place is 2790 sq feet, that would have been $1250/sq foot, which is more like Millennium pricing, not what I would expect to see in an industrial part of The Mission.
    Even today’s pricing at $650 per sq foot seems pretty aggressive, given the neighborhoods median of under $500. This one is in for further rounds of cuts.
    [Editor’s Note: Nope, the $3,500,000 was just for this unit as Timmy wasn’t the only one smoking something back in early 2008.]

  3. Posted by Jay

    if the sale of the adjacent shopping mall went through and redevelopment occurred, any thoughts on the value?
    [Editor's Note: From Seals Stadium, To Strip Mall, To 1,800 Rental Units On 16th?]

  4. Posted by ricker

    The reason for shopping center sale is because the current owner (JV w very capable developer) can’t pull off the redevelopment themselves. Long term Safeway lease + grocery store required parking = highly unlikely redevelopment.

  5. Posted by Fluffy

    Beautiful place, great views!

  6. Posted by SocketSite

    The asking price for 141 Hampshire Street Unit #B has just been reduced $122,000 (6.8%), now asking $1,673,000.

  7. Posted by john


  8. Posted by SocketSite

    As john notes, 141 Hampshire Street Unit #B has sold. And now we have the sale price: Lincecum’s Old Party Pad Gets Traded.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *