292-296 Townsend Entrance
In 1996 Dan Friedlander, the founder of Limn, designed and built a three part modern compound spanning 292 to 296 Townsend Street behind his store at 290 Townsend.
Friedlander sold the 1,900 square foot two-bedroom condo at 296 Townsend for $1,012,500 in 2002. The remaining two thirds of the compound hit the market in 2009 asking $7,490,000 for 292 Townsend (the Limn Art Gallery) and 294 Townsend (Friedlander’s four bedroom condo) combined, reduced to $5,700,000 in 2010.
Withdrawn from the MLS without a reported sale, 294 Townsend has just returned to the market asking $2,500,000 for the approximately 2,500 square foot condo alone.
294 Townsend Living
Keep in mind that it’s officially an “Artist Use with License Required” property according to the listing, although we’ve seen a bit of license taken with said requirement in the past.
∙ Listing: 294 Townsend (4/3) – $2,500,000 [vanguardsf.com]
292-294 Townsend: The Gallery House [galleryhousesf.com]

12 thoughts on “Calling All (Not So Starving) Artists”
  1. Has anyone heard of the city ever enforcing the ‘artist use’ requirement? I know plenty of people living in ‘artist only’ lofts but none of them make a living as an artist.

  2. 6 pictures of living room and no pictures of any bedrooms or bathrooms. Hmmm…
    [Editor’s Note: Try the non-listing link we provided above.]

  3. Most code enforcement like that is complaint driven, so nothing happens unless there is a problem. Oddly enough, the way the law is written things tend to go the other direction. That is, in an artist loft it is legal to engage in production and crafts that might not be considered legal in an ordinary residential unit.

  4. I think it’s also very difficult to define what constitutes “art”. Technically, I can make a crayon drawing on a piece of paper and slap it on my wall and BOOM! I’m an artist.

  5. I’m curious what it would take to get the “requisite” license. I suspect the city is limited to some pretty basic objective considerations to avoid legal problems, and I’m guessing it may be pretty easy to get this license and avoid any potential hassles (but it sounds like that risk is very low anyway).

  6. wifey: if this house belongs to the owner of LIMN, then he prolly just cycles furniture through here and the showroom. One of the perks of being a retail business owner.

  7. It probably doesn’t help that it’s zoned sli and due to the large unoccupied lower unit, doesn’t meet owner occupancy requirements for a normal mortgage. Wouldn’t the bottom unit count as a loft conversion if it was formerly an art gallery? Aren’t conversions now prohibited?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *