May 4, 2009
Thirty Percent Of 767 Bryant Returns As REO (But Not Speedwagon)

In August of 2006 twenty apartments at 767 Bryant hit the market as condos. At the time list prices ranged from $676,920 to $1,850,000 including 767 Bryant #409 at $676,920 and 767 Bryant #210 at $1,200,000.
Despite a subsequent remodeling, reductions and incentives (including a free Prius or Mini Cooper), at least six of the units failed to sell and were lost to foreclosure.
On Friday 767 Bryant #409 returned to the market as a bank owned property (REO) asking $525,000 (23% less than in 2006) and 767 Bryant #210 returned to the market as an REO property asking $799,000 (33% less than in 2006).
∙ Listing: 767 Bryant #409 (1/2) 908 sqft - $525,000 [MLS]
∙ Listing: 767 Bryant #210 (2/3) 2,041 sqft - $799,000 [MLS]
∙ 767 Bryant: The Apartments Condominiums [SocketSite]
∙ Buy A Condo Get A Car At 767 Bryant [SocketSite]
First Published: May 4, 2009 1:00 AM
Comments from "Plugged In" Readers
Not Surprising. These condos are ugly and the location is wanting.
M.R.
Posted by: Mystery Realtor at May 4, 2009 6:36 AM
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from another you been taken back by the bank
...sorry, couldn't resist.
Posted by: Brahma (incensed renter) at May 4, 2009 7:32 AM
Does anyone know if all 20 units were sold as condos (did any stay as developer owned rentals)?
Posted by: FormerAptBroker at May 4, 2009 7:37 AM
So much for Ridin' the Storm Out! You know, I just Can't Fight This Feeling anymore but these condos were a terrible idea. $1,200,000 for a 2/3 next to the criminal courthouse? In My Dreams! You can't blame the developer too much though, as they certainly tried to Roll With the Changes and Keep Pushin' these units. Buy a condo get a car? Talk about I Don't Want to Lose You! My advice to the residents of 767 -- get in your free Prius and Take It on the Run, baby!
Time for Me to Fly,
Stu
Posted by: Stu at May 4, 2009 7:52 AM
The developer kept three of the units.
Posted by: piper at May 4, 2009 7:55 AM
Looking at these units back when they first came on the market I got the impression that this was the worst design and the worst build quality that I have seen in any loft condo, and that is saying a lot. The money obviously did not go to starchitect fees or high quality finishes or on demand water heaters for each unit, so where did all the money go? Land costs?
The location may not be the best, but it is not bad for South of Market and is walking distance to many things. However good it may be for development to be encouraged, this miserable structure serves best as a dire warning.
Posted by: Mole Man at May 4, 2009 8:24 AM
"Crummy poorly located & overpriced building plunges in value" news at 10 ...
$800k ain't exactly giving the place away. That's still $400 psf.
Posted by: Jimmy (No Longer Bitter) at May 4, 2009 9:27 AM
I considered buying there in 2007 because they seemed to be the most reasonably priced lofts available. But the area, the building, and the unit itself were all very unimpressive. So glad I just looked.
& Stu is winning for best comment.
Posted by: looker at May 4, 2009 9:29 AM
That area is terrible. Apologies to anyone who did buy around there, but I had to walk through there recently for jury duty and can say it ain't getting any better. SOMA still feels a little bit like a scene from escape from NY. They just haven't put up the razor wire yet.
Posted by: Mr T at May 4, 2009 9:39 AM
Wasn't this building tied-up in litigation for a while -- and didn't that impact potential sales during that time period? Terrible location if you own a dog.
Posted by: OpenHouse at May 4, 2009 10:38 AM
Turkeys only fly when they have a LOT OF LIFT.
Posted by: Wild Turkey at May 4, 2009 12:02 PM
We looked at these last year and weren't impressed, the location sucks, the constant sound of the highway doesn't help either.
Posted by: asad at May 4, 2009 12:11 PM
If you go into foreclosure do you get to keep the car? (devious ideas...)
Posted by: sf at May 4, 2009 4:12 PM
i used to rent a top-floor unit from an owner who went into foreclosure, declared bankruptcy, and absconded with my sizable deposit. which sucked... but at least i didn't own the place. that building has the worst construction quality i've ever seen.
Posted by: vindicated at May 4, 2009 5:14 PM
Way over priced - the location sucks. Go on, flame me.
Posted by: lolcat_94123 at May 4, 2009 7:40 PM
Err.. "go on, flame me again."
Posted by: lolcat_94123 at May 4, 2009 11:45 PM
While not listed above, the short sale of 767 Bryant #205 closed escrow yesterday with a reported contract price of $595,000 (listed at $699,000). That's $374 per square foot and 36% under its sale price of $933,000 in April of 2007.
Posted by: SocketSite at June 25, 2009 11:41 AM
The asking prices for 767 Bryant #404, #406, and #409 have been reduced to $475,000.
Posted by: SocketSite at July 1, 2009 11:44 AM
Post a comment
Continue Perusing SocketSite:
« Prettier (Or Pettier) In Pink For 23 Presidio Terrace? | HOME | Millennium Tower Trivia (And One Bedroom Resale) »

